THE NEW WEST: Protecting Place

By on April 4, 2017

Yellowstone’s Dan Wenk warns the ecosystem will only be saved by hard choices and vision.

JACKSON HOLE, WY – More than four decades ago, Dan Wenk was a college student in Michigan intent upon becoming a professional landscape architect. In a way, he fulfilled his dream. He never thought it would happen being a career civil servant in the employ of the National Park Service.

Today, holding down one of the most prestigious, most respected posts in government—the superintendency of Yellowstone—Wenk believes the essence of America’s first national park will only be secured not by aspiring to keep setting visitation records but in trying to reduce the impacts of our species.

Wenk’s skill set is equal parts 21st century corporate executive (overseeing a staff of 800 and a budget topping $40 million), tree hugger, motivational speaker, and, by the nature of terrain he’s charged with safeguarding, a field marshal.

Years before returning to Yellowstone (he actually had a stint there earlier in his life), Wenk oversaw Mount Rushmore, the very epitome of an artificial landmark. Like Yellowstone, Rushmore, he says, compels reflection.

“I came to believe that people took away from Mount Rushmore something of what they brought with them. If they were veterans of World War II and were highly patriotic, they left with a heightened sense of patriotism,” he said. “If they were Native Americans with a feeling of oppression, they came away still thinking of it [the faces of four white men chiseled into a mountain illegally taken from them] as a travesty imposed upon their native sacred lands.”

Dan Wenk, superintendent of Yellowstone National Park

“But with Yellowstone,” Wenk continued, “I think it has the power to transform, to alter your notion of what nature is, to leave you a little more humbled and kind of stunned to think that the park belongs to you and you can have a feeling of connectedness to the things inside it.”

Wenk doesn’t mince words. Yellowstone is being loved to death and the least studied mammal, he likes to say, is humans. “We have to know more about what rising numbers of people are doing to impact the visitor experience and most importantly, the irreplaceable wonders they are coming to see. We can’t continue to have double digit increases in visitation without knowing exactly what the impacts already are.”

Could a public transportation system work to lessen the crushing impacts brought by cars and private tour busses?

A quarter century ago, U.S. Sen. Malcolm Wallop of Wyoming asked the Park Service to study the feasibility of having monorails built in Yellowstone but it was dismissed by the agency as too expensive. The upfront costs of constructing monorails were 15 to 30 times the price per mile of rebuilding the highways. The irony with monorails, some claimed, is that many more people could have actually moved through the park resulting in less physical impact.

Even with frontcountry crowds, some see the backcountry as being “underutilized” and want more activities—something Wenk says is a bad idea because the goal shouldn’t be to fill up the park with as many people as possible.

Ecologists note that Yellowstone, by itself, isn’t large enough to sustain viable wildlife populations and packing more of us into the backcountry will only exacerbate stresses on those creatures, especially as climate change alters habitat. “Unfortunately,” Wenk said, “there are people who want us to take the risk in order to serve their own selfish desires. They want it because it’s forbidden fruit and they don’t care of the consequences it would have.”

In recent years, Wenk presided as chairman of the Greater Yellowstone Coordinating Committee, the interagency body entrusted to look at land management issues across invisible human-drawn boundaries. He pressed colleagues with the Forest Service and sister agencies in the U.S. Department of the Interior, the Fish and Wildlife Service and Bureau of Land Management, to be more attentive of how the impacts of decisions ripple across jurisdictions.

He pressed the Forest Service to welcome park bison and to have the Fish and Wildlife Service become better advocates for protecting transboundary park grizzly bears. In many instances, he ran into a brick wall, observers say. Many agencies are still stuck in their silo mentalities, still reticent to embrace ecosystem management as the vision was initially presented decades ago.

“I think Yellowstone and places like Yellowstone can survive because they’re becoming more important to segments of our population than they were before,” Wenk said. “Our society will not let them go. The challenge does not involve a larger societal question but it’s really one that should be directed to people in the region making decisions on a daily basis that all add up—county commissioners and city councils and other kinds of elected officials. And people willing to accept limits and self-restraint in order to hold onto something greater. We need leadership. We need ecosystem actions to match the ecosystem rhetoric.” PJH

Todd Wilkinson has been writing his award-winning New West column for nearly 30 years. It appears weekly in Planet Jackson Hole. He is author of the recent award-winning book, Grizzlies of Pilgrim Creek, An Intimate Portrait of 399, the Most Famous Grizzly of Greater Yellowstone only available at

About Todd Wilkinson

Todd Wilkinson, founder of Mountain Journal (which just published a long piece on climate change in Greater Yellowstone), is also author of Grizzlies of Pilgrim Creek about famous Greater Yellowstone grizzly bear 399 featuring 150 photographs by Tom Mangelsen, available only at

You must be logged in to post a comment Login